I've read a good number of the articles but not all.
I'll start with the biggest issue: Happy Birthday! Liar. You know what I see? Sexual intimidation. I know we've already gone beyond bounds when it comes to sexuality, but it makes no difference in my desire for privacy and having myself as my own possession.
"But Nastya, November, journalism graduate, comes up trumps with the phrase, “I don’t need a fire bell, I need you,” which manages to combine opposition blogging, a national disaster and lust for a man almost three times her age, in just eight words."
I take it you guys get these names from a song about a year ago: Nasty girl.
I'll give you kudos for your competence. I hate Maggie Bell. I saw another article about Mikhail Pokrohov or something like that. I don't know if that is another control freak Maggie connection or this Mikhail is someone else, but I really don't want any of your sadism with you dolling and forcing me and Maggie together.
Next, you want me to feel like a freak by saying I lust a man three times my age. Putin, I wonder if he represents himself, or if I should assume he is someone else's cat. It seems anyway that both Demetri and Putin are going for the same message: I don't deserve abuse or sick interrogation tests and experiments for childhood animal acts.
You guys need to know the lack of privacy and sexual intimidation factor is already old.
I do not know what your hidden agenda is when seduction is put into play.
I think I may have a reciprocating spirit on the matter when it comes to the last thought.
As leaders, I'm sure many may have tried to trick you in some way with their seduction. After your government is already known for corruption, I'm sure its no bruise to your leadership ego. You probably don't even count yourselves as being tricked.
If you want honesty, men in power is an easier turn on for me. Not all men, but most men in power is a seduction factor I can come across.
I did read the blog about Cyprus. God, I can't believe the president is named Demetri Christifios. Oh my God. You are actually continuing on with the sacrelig afer I have already mocked it. I assume your online paper is probably somehow personally corrupt messages to me. I wonder how long "Christofios" has actually been president of the small island. Besides the sacreligion, you rub in the communism: "Yes, its a communist island, you're already aware of that." As if I should settle and permanently adjust to it. If he was in my world, I wonder who this Demetri guy represents. Maybe he represents himself and thinks, who knows what he really thinks.
Ok, I said you guys are dangerous. I feel I'm already in some sort of trap where it isn't possible that I can run. You already made it very obvious that you can see my in my room.
But, if this is a game of chicken in a dangerous head on collision, then lets play chicken. So you can see me in my room. SO WHAT?! SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? DO YOU THINK IT IS GOING TO KEEP ME FROM DOING OTHER THINGS IN LIFE? DO YOU THINK YOUR DISTANT STOCKHOLM IS STRONG ENOUGH TO HAVE POWER OVER ME IN ANYWAY? DO YOU THINK THAT I THINK I'M AT YOUR MERCY? DO YOU THINK YOU CAN KEEP ME SILENCED? DO YOU THINK I'M FEARFUL OF GETTING INVOLVED IN A RELATIONSHIP IF I EVER HAD THE OPPORTUNITY WITH SOMEONE ELSE? DO YOU THINK I'M FEARFUL OF SLEEPING WITH ANOTHER MAN? ARE YOU ARROGANT TO THINK THAT EVEN IF YOU CAN SEDUCE ME, THAT I WILL STAY CHASTISED AND WAIT IN ISOLATION AND MISS OUT ON OTHER POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITIES? YOU'VE ALREADY SCARRED ME WITH SOME OF THE SEXUAL EXPLOITS, YOUR REJECTION, AND YOUR HATE. ALL I AM TO YOU IS MOST LIKELY A HOODRAT ON THE SIDE THAT YOU WANT TO SLAVE IN ISOLATION AND USE AT YOUR CONVENIENCE WHEN NECESSARY. WHAT IS YOUR EXPLANATION?
NO. YOU MAY THINK YOU HAVE ME BY YOUR STOCKHOLM, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE ME.
